Esports Odds at 1Win and 1xBet

Esports betting has emerged as one of the fastest-growing segments in the global wagering industry, with competitive gaming tournaments generating betting volumes rivaling traditional sports. The rapid evolution of esports presents unique challenges and opportunities for odds calculation and pricing strategy. Understanding how 1Win and 1xBet calculate and present esports coefficients is essential for identifying value in this dynamic market. This comprehensive examination explores esports odds structures, margin analysis, game-specific pricing variations, and strategic approaches to exploiting inefficiencies across both platforms.

Understanding Esports Odds Fundamentals

Esports-Specific Odds Challenges

Esports betting differs fundamentally from traditional sports betting in several crucial dimensions that directly affect coefficient calculation and pricing efficiency. Teams emerge and dissolve rapidly, player rosters change frequently, game patches alter competitive dynamics unpredictably, and meta-game shifts create immediate volatility in established hierarchies.

These factors create pricing inefficiencies more pronounced than traditional sports. Bookmakers face difficulty generating historical data comparable to established sports with decades of precedent. Rapid meta changes mean yesterday’s dominant strategy becomes obsolete overnight, rendering historical performance analysis less predictive than in traditional sports.

Decimal Odds Format in Esports

Both 1Win and 1xBet utilize decimal odds format across esports markets. Understanding implied probability calculations remains identical to traditional sports:

Example Coefficient Analysis:

• Team A odds: 1.60 (implied probability: 62.5%)
• Team B odds: 2.30 (implied probability: 43.5%)
• Combined probability: 106.0%
• Bookmaker margin: 6.0%

Margin Characteristics in Esports

Esports betting typically involves higher bookmaker margins than established sports:

Premium esports events (International tournaments):

• Margin: 4.5-6.5% (approaching traditional sports efficiency)
• Higher betting volumes creating more competitive pricing
• Better odds availability for sharp bettors

Secondary esports events (Regional competitions, online tournaments):

• Margin: 7.0-11.0% (reflecting lower volumes and analytical uncertainty)
• Significant opportunities for knowledgeable bettors
• Odds frequently mispriced due to limited market liquidity

Esports Odds at 1Win: Detailed Coefficient Analysis

1Win has invested substantially in esports betting infrastructure, offering competitive coefficients across major competitive gaming titles.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO) Odds Structure

CS:GO represents one of the most established esports betting markets with relatively efficient pricing at 1Win.

Major Tournament Coefficient Examples (Tier-1 International Event):

Top-Tier Team vs Secondary Competitor:

• Natus Vincere: 1.35-1.50
• Secondary European team: 2.50-3.00
• Margin: 5.8-6.2%

The narrow margin reflects substantial betting volume on premium CS:GO events, creating competitive pricing similar to traditional sports.

Competitive Matchup (Ranked teams 1-4 facing each other):

• Team A: 1.85-1.95
• Team B: 1.85-1.95
• Margin: 5.1-5.9%

Significant Underdog Potential:

• Top team: 1.15-1.25
• Rising challenger: 4.50-5.50
• Margin: 6.5-7.2%

Dota 2 Odds at 1Win

Dota 2 presents different pricing dynamics due to strategic complexity and result unpredictability:

International Tournament Coefficients:

Team Liquid vs Emerging Chinese Team:

• Team Liquid: 1.40-1.60
• Emerging Chinese team: 2.40-2.60
• Margin: 5.9-6.5%

The higher margins on Dota 2 reflect greater uncertainty in complex team strategy games where meta shifts dramatically affect competitive balance.

Minor League Tournament:

• Favorite team: 1.25-1.40
• Secondary team: 2.80-3.50
• Margin: 6.8-7.5%

Lower betting volumes on minor Dota 2 tournaments create broader margins and better opportunities for analytical bettors.

League of Legends Odds

League of Legends generates substantial esports betting volumes, particularly around regional championships and international tournaments:

LEC (European Championship) Match:

Top-Tier Team vs Mid-Tier Competitor:

• G2 Esports: 1.25-1.40
• Secondary team: 2.80-3.50
• Margin: 6.5-7.2%

Balanced Regional Matchup:

• Team A: 1.85-2.00
• Team B: 1.80-1.95
• Margin: 5.1-5.8%

Worlds Championship Predictions (International LoL tournament):

Korean Dominance Expectations:

• T1 (traditional favorite): 3.00-4.00
• European representatives: 5.00-8.00
• Chinese teams: 6.00-10.00
• Other regions: 15.00-50.00+

The wide coefficient spread reflects substantial uncertainty in international competition despite Korean historical dominance.

Valorant Odds Structure

Valorant coefficients reflect the game’s relative newness and rapidly evolving competitive landscape:

Professional League Coefficient Examples:

Established Franchise Team vs New Team:

• Established team: 1.30-1.45
• New team: 2.75-3.25
• Margin: 6.2-6.9%

The broader margins reflect higher uncertainty in newer competitive ecosystems with less established hierarchies.

VCT (Valorant Champions Tour) International Event:

Superteam vs Dark Horse:

• Superteam: 1.50-1.70
• Dark horse contender: 2.20-2.50
• Margin: 5.8-6.5%

Overwatch Odds (Legacy Title)

While declining in prominence, Overwatch still generates betting activity with specific coefficient characteristics:

Overwatch League Coefficients:

Established Franchise vs Expansion Team:

• Established franchise: 1.20-1.35
• Expansion team: 3.50-4.50
• Margin: 6.8-7.5%

Esports Odds at 1xBet: Comprehensive Coefficient Structure

1xBet typically provides more extensive esports coverage with specialized markets and detailed segmentation.

Enhanced CS:GO Coefficients

1xBet segments CS:GO betting more granularly:

Map-Specific Betting (Critical in CS:GO):

Map 1 Predictions (First map in best-of-3):

• Favorite: 1.70-1.90
• Underdog: 1.90-2.10
• Margin: 5.2-5.8%

Map 2 Predictions (After map 1 result):

• Favorite conditional odds: 1.60-1.80 (if winning map 1)
• Favorite conditional odds: 2.00-2.30 (if losing map 1)
• Margin adjusts based on match context

Map 3 Predictions (Deciding map):

• Increased uncertainty creates broader spreads
• Margin: 6.5-7.5% reflecting volatility

Round-Level Betting (Advanced Market):

Next Round Winner (Individual 15-round segments):

• Favorite: 1.85-2.05
• Underdog: 1.85-2.05
• Margin: 5.1-5.9%

1xBet offers round-level betting creating microscopic betting windows with dynamic coefficient adjustments.

Dota 2 Advanced Markets at 1xBet

1xBet provides sophisticated Dota 2 betting including:

Game Outcome Combinations:

Team A wins game 1 AND game 2 (best-of-3):

• Coefficient: 2.80-3.50
• Reflects combination probability
• Margin: 6.2-7.1%

First to Kill Prediction:

• Team A: 1.90-2.10
• Team B: 1.90-2.10
• Margin: 5.1-5.9%

Game Duration Markets:

Over/Under 45 Minutes (Dota 2 average game length):

• Over: 1.85-2.05
• Under: 1.85-2.05
• Margin: 5.1-5.9%

Baron/Roshan First Prediction:

• Team A secures objective: 1.95-2.15
• Team B secures objective: 1.90-2.10

League of Legends Detailed Markets

1xBet segments LoL betting extensively:

Ban/Pick Phase Predictions:

First Blood Prediction (First player kill):

• Team A: 1.95-2.15
• Team B: 1.90-2.10
• Margin: 5.0-5.8%

Dragon/Baron Control:

• Team A first objective: 1.95-2.15
• Team B first objective: 1.90-2.10

Tower Destruction Predictions:

• Team A destroys first tower: 1.90-2.10
• Team B destroys first tower: 1.90-2.10

Gold Lead at Specific Times:

• Team A leading after 15 minutes: 1.80-2.00
• Team B leading after 15 minutes: 1.80-2.00

Valorant Advanced Markets

1xBet offers Valorant-specific betting including:

Round Prediction Chains (Individual round outcomes):

Next Round Result:

• Team A round win: 1.85-2.05
• Team B round win: 1.85-2.05
• Margin: 5.1-5.9%

Economic Round Predictions (Low-economy vs full-buy situations):

Pistol Round Winner (First round):

• Team A: 1.85-2.05
• Team B: 1.85-2.05

Full Economy Conditions:

• Higher coefficient spreads: 1.70-2.30 depending on team strength

Esports Tournament Winner Markets

1xBet provides extensive tournament-level betting:

International Tournament Predictions:

CS:GO Major Championship Winner:

• Natus Vincere: 3.50-4.50
• FaZe Clan: 4.00-5.00
• Outsiders: 4.50-5.50
• Emerging team: 8.00-15.00
• Combined margin: 5.8-6.5%

Dota 2 International Winner:

• Team Liquid: 4.00-5.00
• Virtus Pro: 4.50-5.50
• Chinese teams: 5.00-8.00
• Emerging teams: 10.00-50.00+

League of Legends Worlds Winner:

• T1: 3.50-5.00
• European representatives: 6.00-10.00
• LEC regional representatives: 12.00-25.00

Direct Coefficient Comparison: 1Win vs 1xBet

CS:GO Head-to-Head Comparison

Tier-1 International Match (Natus Vincere vs FaZe Clan):

1Win Coefficients:

• Natus Vincere: 1.42
• FaZe Clan: 2.65
• Margin: 6.1%

1xBet Coefficients:

• Natus Vincere: 1.44
• FaZe Clan: 2.63
• Margin: 5.9%

Analysis: 1xBet offers marginally better coefficients (1.44 vs 1.42 for favorite) with lower margin.

Dota 2 Coefficient Comparison

International Tournament Match:

1Win:

• Team Liquid: 1.65
• Secondary team: 2.20
• Margin: 6.2%

1xBet:

• Team Liquid: 1.68
• Secondary team: 2.18
• Margin: 5.9%

1xBet again provides slightly superior pricing.

League of Legends Comparison

LEC Regular Season Match (G2 vs Secondary Team):

1Win:

• G2: 1.32
• Secondary: 3.10
• Margin: 6.5%

1xBet:

• G2: 1.35
• Secondary: 3.05
• Margin: 6.1%

1xBet maintains consistent coefficient advantages.

Margin Summary Across Esports Titles

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive:

• 1Win: 5.8-7.2% margin
• 1xBet: 5.5-6.8% margin
• Winner: 1xBet (0.3-0.4% average advantage)

Dota 2:

• 1Win: 6.0-7.5% margin
• 1xBet: 5.8-7.2% margin
• Winner: 1xBet (consistent slight advantage)

League of Legends:

• 1Win: 5.9-7.0% margin
• 1xBet: 5.5-6.8% margin
• Winner: 1xBet (0.4-0.2% advantage)

Valorant:

• 1Win: 6.5-8.0% margin
• 1xBet: 6.2-7.8% margin
• Winner: 1xBet (0.3% average advantage)

Tournament Winners:

• 1Win: 5.5-6.5% margin
• 1xBet: 5.2-6.2% margin
• Winner: 1xBet (0.3% consistent advantage)

Factors Affecting Esports Coefficients

Team Strength and Rankings

Esports team hierarchies remain less stable than traditional sports, creating coefficient volatility:

• Top-10 ranked teams typically 1.20-1.50 odds as favorites vs outside-top-10
• Ranking positions worth approximately 0.08-0.12 coefficient adjustment
• Rapid ranking changes create frequent coefficient recalibrations

Meta-Game Shifts

Game patches and meta changes dramatically affect coefficients:

• Major patch releases: 0.15-0.40 coefficient adjustments for affected teams
• Meta favoring specific team’s strength: 0.10-0.25 immediate adjustment
• Emergence of new strategies: Creates temporary coefficient inefficiencies

Player Roster Changes

Team composition significantly impacts coefficients:

• Losing key player: 0.20-0.40 coefficient lengthening
• Star player addition: 0.15-0.30 coefficient shortening
• Team restructuring: 0.25-0.50+ adjustment reflecting uncertainty

Recent Form and Performance Trends

Esports form changes rapidly:

• Winning streaks (3+ consecutive victories): 0.10-0.20 coefficient reduction
• Losing streaks: 0.15-0.25 coefficient extension
• Tournament performance: Weighted more heavily than statistics

Betting Volume and Market Liquidity

Market efficiency directly correlates with wagering volumes:

• International tournament matches: 4.5-6.5% margins from high volumes
• Regional competitions: 7.0-9.0% margins with moderate volumes
• Minor online tournaments: 9.0-12.0% margins reflecting minimal volumes
• Emerging competitive scenes: 12.0-15%+ margins creating substantial opportunities

Patch Release Timing

Game updates affect competitive balance significantly:

• Pre-patch uncertainty: Broaden coefficient spreads by 0.05-0.15
• Post-patch meta adjustment: Coefficients recalibrate as teams adapt
• Major balance changes: Create 0.15-0.40 coefficient shifts

Tournament Stage Importance

Match significance affects team intensity and coefficients:

• Group stage matches: Standard coefficient spreads
• Playoff qualification matches: 0.05-0.10 intensity adjustment
• Finals matches: 0.10-0.20 coefficient tightening reflecting peak performance
• Bo1 vs Bo3/Bo5: Longer series reduce variance, narrowing margins

Strategic Coefficient Analysis for Esports Bettors

Identifying Inefficient Pricing

Overvalued Favorites in Volatile Metas:

• Teams at 1.25-1.35 that should be 1.35-1.45
• Occurs when meta shifts haven’t been fully priced in
• Value opportunities on underdogs

Emerging Team Undervaluation:

• Rising teams at 3.00-4.00 odds that should be 2.50-3.00
• Reflects slow market adjustment to improved performance
• Accumulator opportunities combining emerging teams

International vs Regional Coefficient Gaps:

• International competition coefficients typically efficient (5.5-6.5% margins)
• Regional competition coefficients often inefficient (7.5-10.0% margins)
• Specialized regional expertise creates analytical edges

Early Odds Advantage in Esports

Pre-Tournament Positioning:

• 1xBet frequently posts odds before patch impacts fully understood
• Early tournament odds often contain mispricings from uncertain meta assessments
• Lock in coefficients before sharp movement adjusts pricing

Live Coefficient Swings:

• Esports live odds shift dramatically on individual game wins/losses
• Early match disadvantages create exaggerated underdog coefficients
• Real-time value hunting opportunities more pronounced than traditional sports

Portfolio Coefficient Strategy

Combining 1Win and 1xBet:

• 1xBet average 0.3-0.4% coefficient advantage on major events
• Over 100+ wagers annually, platform selection compounds significantly
• Optimal strategy: Use both platforms, wagering at superior coefficient each instance

Conclusion

Esports coefficients at 1Win and 1xBet reflect unique market characteristics distinct from traditional sports betting. 1Win maintains competitive coefficients averaging 5.8-7.5% margins across major esports titles. 1xBet consistently provides marginally superior pricing with average 5.5-7.2% margins, offering consistent 0.3-0.4% advantages on primary markets.

Strategic esports bettors comparing coefficients across platforms, identifying inefficiencies from rapid meta shifts, and specializing in specific game titles extract consistent value from esports betting. The rapidly evolving competitive landscape creates pronounced pricing inefficiencies that knowledgeable analytical bettors can systematically exploit through careful coefficient analysis and platform selection strategies.