This article below, taken from affes.wordpress.com from 2012 – a blog that investigates government statistics on immigration – touches upon the overrepresentation of ‘foreign’ born criminals in Sweden’s crime statistics.
All data is compiled from The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, or BRÅ, described on its website to be “an agency under the Ministry of Justice – is a centre for research and development within the judicial system.”
The total Muslim population in Sweden is estimated at 4.4% (2013 figures). Out of that 4.4%, and if we casually deduct the women and children, we can conclude that at least 2% are males.
Pew Research Center estimates the number of Muslims in Sweden at 451,000 (or 4.9% of the total population) for the year 2010. They project this to increase to 993,000 (or 9.9% of the total population) by the year 2030. Out of that 4.9%, and if we deduct the women and children, we can conclude that at least 2-3% are males.
Although there are no official statistics of Muslims in Sweden, estimates count 200,000—250,000 people of Muslim background in 2000 (i.e. anyone who fits the broad definition of someone who “belongs to a Muslim people by birth, has Muslim origin, has a name that belongs in the Muslim tradition, etc. “), roughly estimated close to 100,000 of which are second-generation. Of the first-generation Muslims, 255,000 are thought to be Sunni, 5,000 Shi’ites, no more than 1,000 Ahmadiya, Alevi and other groups and probably no more than 5,000 converts – mainly women married to Muslim men. The Muslim Council of Sweden reported 106,327 officially registered members. Swedish estimates are rather 350,000, including nominal Muslims and people from a Muslim background.
The ‘foreign born’ rape figures at 77.6% (from 2005) does not contain religious data but the reported suspects originate from countries that are represented by Islam. We have seen the Muslim domination in rape figures in Oslo (Norway) police stats from 2011, for example. Oslo Police inspector Hanne Kristin Rodhe says the perpetrators often are unemployed, have been asylum-seekers during the last five years. A rough estimate of 80% Muslim rape figure has been anonymously confirmed by Swedish police in a phone conversation with our volunteer. In early February 2017 a police whistleblower revealed that over 80% of violent crimes in the country are committed by ‘immigrants’ (the names he provided in his daily roster shows Muslim names behind the term ‘immigrants’)
Let us hope that a complete un-biased, transperant and accurate government study will one day reveal the real figures. The reason government figures are held with limited access is because the summary would be shocking and outrageous. The actual figure could be higher. The percentages presented in the article below does not include Muslims with Swedish citizenship contained within rapes in the figures categorized under “Swedish nationals”.
[Google translate from original article from Affes.wordpress.com]
When I have “rape” in the title will increase visits to your blog dramatically. Rape upset, and rightly so, that’s a disgusting crime which affects both women and men in depth. If a connection is made to immigrants over the presentation of rape crimes, it becomes very explosive. What we know of course our rulers and authorities. Therefore, they do everything for us in the dark. It is rarely direct lies. It would be too risky. Effective propaganda is all about creating uncertainty. Insecure people are passive.
One way to create uncertainty is failing to investigate and find out the facts. Or, as in this case: facts and findings are available, but they are not released to the public.
The only major study that has been made regarding immigrants overrepresented in rape where the results became public, the investigation is in BRÅ-raport 1996:2 (The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention), which covers the years 1985-1989.
Here I have started from the report’s estimate in Table 24 (p. 74). The pie chart on the right you can see that even then (1985-1989) were persons of Swedish background in the minority of 39 percent.
These things I have counted on the 2011 conditions, see the chart at the top of the post. People of Swedish descent account for 22.4 percent. The reason that Swedes have such a high percentage is that I have taken account of the new sexual offenses law which came 2005th Without it, the Swedes percentage was less.1 Non registered percentage I have made known to remain at 10 percent. It may be a conservative estimate. Increased the percentage would of course Swedes percentage decrease.
Who exactly are committing these rapes?
The BRÅ report from 1996 reported over-representation of immigrants of different types of crime are divided on which countries / geographical areas, people came from. According to the National Council is the data set for including rape too thin (p. 61):
As for murder, manslaughter, rape, other sexual offenses, robbery and burglary are the values of brottsparticipation too small to be able to draw conclusions from them.
Rape figures for the years 1985-1989 was on a completely different level than today. Broken down by individual countries, the material becomes even thinner. It is possible to draw some conclusions, but to draw any firm conclusions needed more data.
Nearly ten years later in 2005 will follow up report. Instead of more data so we can start to draw conclusions do we make this announcement (p. 44):
BRÅ’s last study was done fairly detailed analysis of the foreign-born and ‘immigrants’ children’ over-representation of each crime divided on which countries / geographical areas, people came from. BRÅ has this time decided that such a detailed analysis is not meaningful.
I can agree with. BRÅ’s “analysis” is rarely meaningful. However, a detailed account of the results desired.
It is not that BRÅ did not bother to produce values for the countries of origin. They have obviously taken up all the results. It is after they have seen the results, they judge that there is “meaningful” to account for them. In other words, do the investigators on the BRÅ just how it is with the immigrants’ countries of origin for various categories of crime. Responsible ministers, both then and now, of course have been informed. Thomas Bodström (s), Beatrice Ask (m), Mona Sahlin (s), Erik Ullenhag (fp), Barbro Holmberg (s), Tobias Billström (m) and others.
The Liberal Party’s spokesman on refugee and integration issues Mauricio Rojas wrote on DN-debate a few days before the report was released in 2005:
The sensitive issue, the report explains the concern probably also the slow process of publication of the report presented on Wednesday. The main statistical results have been calculated and analyzed for a long time, but the report’s publication has been delayed because new investigations and treatments deemed necessary depending on the substance of controversial nature.
One who “examined” the material was a Polish former surveyors … * cough *
Among all the “treatments” was therefore to simply delete all the results of the criminal suspects’ countries of origin in relation to specific types of crime such as rape. An apparent cover-up. More than 2000 individual amounts reported in the first report is missing from “monitoring”.
BRÅ chooses words to conceal results they obtain in their investigations. Studies of the Swedish people pay through their taxes. To get an idea, we simply use the values that emerged from the first report. It is certainly old numbers, but for the sake, they need not be misleading. Mauricio Rojas met with investigators nearly a year before the 2005 publication of the report:
Last spring, I met two of those responsible for the report generation, among them the late January Ahlberg, who was also author of the report from 1996. It was a meeting that bore witness to a real nervousness that the publication of the new report led in some environments.
During the call, Ahlberg noted that the new report’s findings essentially confirmed the results of the previous report.
If the new report’s findings essentially confirmed the findings of the previous report, the old figures to be pretty reliable.
Below(2), an evaluation for 2011 based on the information in BRÅ-report 1996:2 Table 2.3 (p. 107)
For the three columns that stand out: Rest of Europe, West Asia and Africa, it is to some extent that they represent large groups of immigrant population. But that’s not the whole explanation. The foreign born from Africa, for example, only 1500 more in population than the foreign born from Europe (yes, you read that right. In the age group 15-54 is the foreign-born Africans are more than the foreign-born from the Nordic countries). Although both groups are almost equal populations are held in Africa is much higher than that of the Nordic countries. It depends on Africans’ over-representation.
For Western Asia, it is mainly Iraq who pulls up the stack. The Iraqis are a major group in Sweden, and they happen to have the second highest over-representation of rape. Only North Africa has a higher value.
Could it possibly have been the result of this style as investigators on National Council came up with 2005? Results confirmed the initial report and made it possible to begin to draw conclusions. The conclusions, if they had been published, might have made people react. Reactions that might have made immigration a matter of choice in parliamentary elections a year later.
This we may never know, but one thing we know for certain: Survey results are available, but they are not released to the public.